Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Obstacles Character's in Marvel's Agent Carter had to Overcome



Season 2 Promo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHMZYTB1Wz0

When people are seen as a threat, a minority, or someone that is weak, they have to work harder in order to achieve the goals that they have set to accomplish. Carl Burgchardt notes in Readings in Rhetorical Criticism that “rhetorical criticism is devoted to assessing the persuasive effect of situated oratory. Rhetorical criticism, according to Wichelns, focuses on discovering and appreciating how speakers adapt their ideas to particular audiences” (Burgchardt, 1). By analyzing a piece of text with a rhetorical method, we can create a better understanding of a text and what the author was trying to convey through their text. The characters in Marvel’s Agent Carter had to overcome many personal obstacles which we can be see by applying different rhetorical methods to analyze the characters. By applying Aristotle’s proofs, epic framing, memorialization, and critical rhetoric on disability, race, and gender, I show the complexity of the characters in Marvel’s Agent Carter.   

Opening scene of Agent Carter with Captain America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHMZYTB1Wz0

      Aristotle’s proofs consist of ethos, pathos, and logos. Marvel’s Agent Carter evokes all three of Aristotle’s proofs throughout the series, but mainly pathos. Aristotle’s pathos is the emotional feelings that the speaker is trying to make the audience feel, as a result, connecting the audience to the speaker on a deeper level. Prior to the beginning of the series, Agent Peggy Carter lost the love of her life, Captain America, during the war. During the first season of Marvel's Agent Carter, Agent Carter had a lot of flashbacks of her time with Captain America and how she suffered once she lost him. Through these flashbacks, you can feel the hurt that she’s feeling because you can genuinely see that she really loved him and missed him. Her flashbacks mainly consist of her remembering the time when she lost him and you can see her shedding tears because of the loss she was experiencing and the fact that she would never get him back.


  Dr. Wilkes and Agent Carter kissing; seeing a shift in her            
                                            Emotions. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlW1XvC7T4E
      
      In the second season we see a transition where she begins a romantic relationship with another person, exuding feelings of happiness from the audience towards her because she is experiencing different feelings than she was feeling in the first season. In a particular scene where Agent Carter believes that her new love interest Dr. Wilkes is believed to be dead after an explosion in a laboratory, she becomes heartbroken. Even though she tries to brush it off as if though she doesn’t care, she really does because she was starting to develop feelings for him. A couple of scenes later it is discovered that he is alive and she rejoices to see that he is not dead, but rather than letting her feelings speak for themselves, she uses work as an excuse for her happiness since she blames herself for Dr. Wilkes being in the moment of the explosion.
The emotions she was feeling in the first season and the second season differ drastically. In the first season she was remembering Captain America and how she lost him, without the hope of ever getting him back. In the second season she started to develop genuine feelings of love for someone else, which she thought had also lost his life, but then turned up alive. Both of these instances cause her to feel like she would never find the “one”, but they bring clarity to her life and the path she wants to direct her love life towards. All of the emotions that Agent Peggy Carter is feeling are relatable to her audience because they are invested in not only seeing her defeat her enemies but they also want her to be successful in her love life. Agent Carter’s emotions deal mainly with her conflicted love life, but there are other issues there are brought up that do not deal only with love, they deal with issues of wanting to succeed and create a better life.


Dottie Underwood fighting a man looking for Agent Carter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np_O4gpJID8

      Dottie Underwood had to prove and overcome the barriers that she stumbled upon while wanting to complete her mission that was assigned to her by the Russian government. Underwood was hired by the Russian government to come to America and steal Howard Stark’s inventions. Throughout the series she is portrayed as someone who is innocent and shy, while she is undercover, but in reality, she is very strong and dangerous. Underwood goes goes through a transition between season 1 and 2, where her weaknesses are exposed.
In the eyes of the Russians, Underwood was seen as a hero; to the American people, she was seen as a threat as Stark’s inventions were classified and could cause extensive damage.  Epic framing is centered around the idea that a hero/ heroine “embodies ideal values of the social order” (Buerkle, Mayer, Olson, 190). Buerkle, Mayer, and Olson paraphrase one of Kenneth Burkes characteristics of epic framing from A Grammar of Motives, “A hero maybe a person who at one time has committed heroic acts, has the potential to perform heroic feats, or embodies the attitudes and virtues that are placed central to the hierarchical existence” (Buerkle, Mayer, Olson, 190). When a person represents a particular groups morals and ideals, and behave in a heroic way, it makes them a hero in the people’s eyes. Even though Dottie Underwood was a Russian spy and sought after the American government, in the eyes of the Russians she was a hero. Underwood upheld the “social order” of the Russians, because her main goal was to help the Russians destroy the Americans during World War II. In the course of the first season, she seduced Howard Stark and stole some of his most dangerous inventions, which in the future, the Russians planned on using to their advantage in order to come out victorious against the Americans.


Underwood’s roles have shifted in season 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxNaGSKnLMw    

Not only was she seen as a threat because of what she was after, but because she was highly trained in defeating the enemy and was deemed unstoppable. Her persona and how she portrayed herself was also key in her achieving what she set out to achieve. Underwood was depicted as someone that was very lovable and caring of others, which only furthered her intentions. Her persona also shows that she is the perfect fit of a Russian hero: strong, determined, and willing to do whatever is necessary to get the job done, “I’ve pulled out my own teeth, my own nails, my own hair. I’ve burned my own flesh with a blowtorch. I’m no Nazi harlot. And you are wasting my time,” says Underwood as she is being held captive and tortured. Her action of stealing Stark’s inventions to help Russia defeat America during World War II and disguising herself as someone she was not, places her as a hero with the Russians and as an enemy for the Americans. 
Her role of being a hero rapidly changes when she is captured by the Americans and brought to justice for the crimes she committed on American soil. She was epically framed by the Russian government because they believed that she would be able to carry out the acts that they wanted her to and did the impossible to make sure that they got what they wanted. On the American side, she was not seen as a hero, rather she was seen as a dangerous person of interest whose sole purpose was to help in defeating the Americans. Her role throughout the show changes as the show continues to progress, beginning the show as a Russian hero and ending up as a traitor in the eyes of the Russians and Americans. Underwood’s character deals with inner demons of wanting to succeed and do whatever it takes to accomplish those goals giving her a sense of success.
Whitney’s Upbringing   Part 1    

https://www.youtube.com/watch?  v=CUch3FCSJZk


Whitney’s Upbringing  Part 2    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXujm7UL7RM



Like Dottie Underwood, Whitey Frost had to also overcome many obstacles to make something of herself. Season two of Marvel’s Agent Carter focused on zero matter, and its creator, Whitney Frost. For many, zero matter was something that would destroy the world, but for Whitney, it meant having power. Her want for power stems from having grown up in a humble, single parent household, where her mom had to prostitute herself in order to support Whitney and herself. As she moved to Hollywood and started to surround herself with people in power, her desire to become powerful only grew.

Frost using zero matter to get what she wants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN_LaE3VR68

Ekaterina V. Haskins explains the way in which we can have different interpretations of a memorial, “public memory and its meaning depend not just on the forms and figures in the monument itself but on the viewer’s response to the monument, how it is used politically and religiously in the community, who sees it under what circumstances, how its figures enter other media and are recast in new surroundings” (Haskins, 90). In Marvel’s Agent Carter, everyone other than Whitney frost, see zero matter as something unknown and something they believe can bring total destruction to the human race. Dr. Wilkes descries zero matter, “zero matter is unlike any substance that we have ever seen. I’m starting to think that it’s more dangerous than anything we’ve ever known.” Dr. Wilkes expresses his fear about zero matter because it is an unknown substance to many. Frost’s take on zero matter is different, she states that “she is the only on that knows what zero matter can do.”    
The memorialization of zero matter is not a concrete monument, rather, it is engraved in the mind of Whitney Frost after zero matter has been destroyed, as a remembrance and tribute to what she accomplished. Having grown up in a household where her mother was a single mom having to prostitute herself in order to support Frost and herself, Frost yearned for a change. She focused her attention on school, although she was always told that no one would want her for her intelligence but for her beauty. The emotional and physical abuse that she had to endure from those around her about her worth, caused her to suffer more once she lost what she had really worked hard for.  

Whitney Frost remembering zero matter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ifllna6KFU8

The creation of zero matter gave Frost hope that she could accomplish what she wanted and not just because you were raised in a broken home, you wouldn’t be able to rise above others. When she lost all control over zero matter, the substance that made her feel accomplished because she felt powerful, she reminisced over what she lost, “it’s gone. it’s all gone. Everything I worked so hard to accomplish.” The living memory of zero matter in Frost’s recollection of events in her life, played a huge role in how it is that zero matter shaped who she became. Zero Mater to Frost was a symbol of success and what she had to endure and what obstacles she had to overcome in order to reach her goals. Losing all control over zero matter symbolized that what her mother told her about her worth was true. Zero matter was all but a vague memory in Frost’s mind as a representation of the hurdles she had to overcome and successes she achieved.
The obstacles that the characters in Marvel’s Agent Carter have had to overcome can be analyzed through a different lens to learn how those obstacles have empowered the characters instead of defeating them. Critical Rhetoric aims to give power and integrate those who are seen as powerless, in order to create a better understanding of their struggles. In Marvel’s Agent Carter, Agent Sousa is the head of the Los Angeles SSR office. Although Agent Sousa is successful in his field, Agent Sousa is a disabled war veteran who sometimes is seen as not being able to carry out the responsibilities that come with his profession.
In the beginning episode of season 2, Agent Sousa is caught fighting an opponent together with his colleagues. During the duration of their fight, Agent Sousa’s colleagues were full with anxiety when he was fighting his opponents because of his disability that does not allow him to fully be able to fight like others who work with him. He views himself as someone who is capable of achieving what other’s can, but the doubt of other’s is what hinders his goal of being able to reach his goals. Because of his disability, Agent Sousa was given mediocre work, until he proved to everyone that he was capable of completing more challenging tasks that his superiors previously thought he could not complete.

Agent Carter arriving in L.A. to work under the direction of Agent Sousa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5UZtb7CBbY

During the first and second season, there was a shift in Agent Sousa’s behavior; he became more adventurous and confident in his work. In the season finale, you can see this more adventurous side to him when it comes to making an important decision. For Agent Sousa, it is not about showing people that he is powerful, rather, it is to show people that he is capable of doing what they can do. By doing so, he is creating a new norm for disabled people, that they can do what other’s do, although they are seen as not being capable of doing what people who are not disabled can do. Agent Sousa’s portrayal of a disabled war veteran gives the audience who can relate to his situation hope that they one day will be able to overcome their disability. Agent Sousa is a great example of someone who became disabled, but was able to overcome his disability in order to further advance in life. Sousa and his colleagues learned to accept his disability and to not underestimate his capabilities just because his disability was not the center of attention after he proved to them that he was just like them. Sousa saw his disability as something that would hinder and haunt him for the rest of his life, but in the end he ended up learning to live and accept his disability showing others with a disability that it was possible to live a normal life with a disability. People with disabilities were not the only group to have to overcome obstacles and learn how to accept them and learn from them.
       In the forming years of the United States African Americans had a lot of obstacles to overcome. They faced problems with discrimination in schools, work, and in any social setting. Dr. Jason Wilkes had to overcome a lot of these obstacles in all of these settings because he was African American.

Dr. Wilkes remembering what he had to overcome to reach his goals of working as a scientist
Photo Credit: Marvel Cinematic Universe 
He reveals to Agent Peggy Carter the struggles that he faced in his early childhood. He continues telling her that he had to work two jobs in order to live a sustainable life and pay his way through school. The two jobs that he held were as a janitor at an observatory and as a harvester in the citrus fields. After he completed his education he struggled to find a job because he was African American and Isodyne was the only company that was willing to give him the opportunity to thrive as a scientist in their labs. Because of the opportunity that was provided to him by Isodyne, he felt hesitant to give Agent Carter the classified information that she needed, resulting in Dr. Wilkes forming a new identity.
Carl Burgchardt states “The emergence of the spatial metaphor in academic work has encouraged scholars in cultural studies and ethnography alike to rethink the ways in which individuals and groups construct identity, administer power, and make sense of their everyday lives. Our dialogues are now replete with spatial tropes of boundaries, centers, margins, and borderlands” (Burgchardt, 634).


Dr. Wilkes with the containment center he built for zero matter
Photo Credit: Marvel Cinematic Universe

      The fact that Dr. Wilkes only took the job at Isodyne because it was the only place that would hire him left him at a place where he felt like it was his only option and therefore took it. He knew that if he took this job, it would lead to bigger, better opportunities. The limitations placed on him because of his race, only allows him to advance as much as African Americans are allowed to advance in a country where they are a minority and seen as inferior. Although he was not given much power, he was in charge of a very important task that made Dr. Wilkes feel powerful at Isodyne, which was building the containment center for Zero Matter. Working at Isodyne gave Dr. Wilkes and other African Americans new possibilities that African Americans can achieve greatness if they take the opportunities that come to them even if it is not what they had in mind. Working at Isodyne as a scientist gave Dr. Wilkes the power to reshape the future of African American identities that they can achieve what others can without taking into account their race. Dr. Wilkes’ struggles help us better understand the obstacles that African Americans have to overcome to make something of themselves.  We may think that overcoming these obstacles is easy for them, but seeing an African American representation in a show, shows that their reality is a harsh one and that Americans have been very unjust to African Americans.  Through critical rhetoric we can not only analyze and better understand the constraints place on racial minorities, we can also understand the limitations that are placed on women.  

Agent Carter working alongside her colleagues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH_vVdpR6_8

As a woman in a place where males where the dominating force, Agent Carter had to overcome many obstacles to prove her worth. In the beginning of the series she is seen as unequal to the men that she works with in an office. Agent Carter’s gender determined the workload she would get and what type of work she would get, typically consisting of secretarial work, instead of receiving work that is geared towards men which those above her know she can accomplish. In Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis, McKerrow states “the focus of a critique of domination is on the discourse of power which creates and sustains the social practices which control the dominated. It is, more particularly, a critique of ideologies, perceived as rhetorical creations” (92). 

Video of the obstacles and disputes Agent Carter is involved in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qeea6Xr6W2g

Agent Carter is mainly given work that is insignificant because the men around her do not like to recognize that a woman is capable of what a man can achieve, therefore resulting in Agent Carter not given the opportunity to show her capabilities. As the dominating gender, males see a woman’s superior capabilities as superior because that can result in them taking their jobs and receiving praise, as is the situation in Agent Carter.
All of the defeat and humiliation left Agent Carter with one resort, proving to her colleagues of what she was capable of achieving without the resources that were readily available to them. Agent Carter’s bravery created new possibilities for women in the workplace, that they can achieve anything that a man can and just because you are put down so many times does not mean that you should continue let yourself be put in that situation. She also created the possibility that both women and men should be equal and not be discriminated based on their gender or their capabilities.  
Looking at the characters from Marvel’s Agent Carter through different perspectives creates different interpretations on how the text is analyzed and interpreted. Using different rhetorical methods to better understand a text has its strengths and weaknesses. Analyzing Peggy Carter’s emotions using pathos does help in raising understanding on her feelings prior to the beginning of the series and explains why she has that tough exterior. Examining Dottie Underwood’s character by using epic framing was not a good call on my part because although she did have her weaknesses, she was seen as a hero, that is until her fate was disclosed during the second season where it is known that she was no longer seen as a hero in Russia. For Whitney Frost, memorialization was a good method to further decipher her persona and who she really was. Using memorialization not only allowed us to see how zero matter was a memory in her mind, but also to learn about her upbringing and that drive that she had to succeed. Critical rhetoric to look at how gender, race, and disabilities are used to further the understanding of a group created new possibilities in understanding their every day lives. In Agent Sousa’s case we saw how it was that he learned how to cope with his disability and not let it cause him to feel crippled by his disability. Dr. Wilkes had to come to the acceptance that he was an African American living in a place where African Americans did not have many opportunities. The opportunities that were presented to him he took them because he knew that was the only way to make something of himself. Agent Carter had to face many of these challenges too. She faced discrimination mainly in the workplace where she was underestimated. She had to prove to her colleagues that she was skilled enough to help in defeating enemies, creating the new possibility that a woman could achieve what a man could. Critical rhetoric provided a more insightful explanation of the obstacles some characters had to overcome and the mark that they left for future generations. The application of different rhetorical methods helps the audience better understand the intricate relationships these characters have with one another and others in the show. These relationships help us better understand how and why these characters were presented with the obstacles they had to overcome and to what great lengths they had to go to overcome them. Without the methods being applied we would be in a place where we wouldn’t understand what was happening and why events were occurring because we would have no concrete analysis and understanding of the methods.



References

Buerkle, Wesley C, Michael E Mayer, Clark D Olson. “Our Hero
         the Buffoon: Contradictory and Concurrent Burkean
         Framing of Arizona Governor Evan Mecham.” Western
         Journal of Communication. 67.2 (2003): 187-206. Print.

Burgchardt, Carl R., ed. Readings in Rhetorical Criticism, 4th
         edition. 4th ed. United States: Strata Publishing, 2010.
Print.

Haskins, Ekaterina V. Ephemeral Visibility and the Art of
         Mourning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 2012.
         Print.
          
McKerrow, Raymie E. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.”

         Communication Monographs. 56. (1989): 91-111. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment